|
THE
“CIVIL RIGHT” TO POLYGAMY?
In
a two day period during the last week of September, the case for
same-sex marriages in America was dealt two serious blows. First,
on September 29, California’s governor Arnold Schwarzenegger
vetoed a bill seeking to legalize same-sex marriages. Then, on September
30, the Netherlands approved its first polygamous civil union. “I
love both Bianca and Mirjam, so I am marrying them both,”
stated Victor de Bruijn, who was already married to Bianca.
Governor
Schwarzenegger has been accused of siding with those who deny gays
and lesbians equality, opposing their basic civil rights. His veto,
which simply upholds the will of the people of California as reflected
in their year 2000 vote, is an obvious setback to the cause of same-sex
marriages. The Netherlands ruling, however, while representing a
less obvious setback to same-sex marriages, is potentially more
damaging. This is because proponents of traditional, heterosexual
marriage have consistently argued that once the fundamental definition
of marriage is changed from “one man and one woman”
to “one person and one person, regardless of sexual orientation,”
there is no logical or rational way to stop the slippery slide into
polygamous marriages, incestuous marriages, or even adult-child
marriages. Indeed, one Canadian scientist has even suggested that,
in the future, there would be nothing to stop someone from marrying
a plant.
Same-sex
marriage proponents have strenuously resisted this line of reasoning,
but with little logical support. On what basis, it may be fairly
asked, is it a civil right for a man to marry a man (or a woman
marry a woman) while it is not a civil right for a man to marry
two (or more) women or a brother to marry his sister or an adult
woman to marry an adolescent girl? Indeed, a case is now pending
in the courts arguing for the right to incestuous marriages, while
Nadine Strossen, the president of the ACLU, has stated that her
organization has “defended the right of individuals to engage
in polygamy.”
Now,
with the Netherlands leading the way, we have moved from theory
to reality, and it is not hard to speculate as to what will come
next. Holland was the first nation to legalize same-sex civil unions
(in 1998), followed by legalized same-sex marriages and full adoption
rights for same-sex couples in 2001. At present, polygamous marriages
are not legal but polygamous civil unions are. What will tomorrow
hold? And where will Mr. Bruijin and his wives find themselves a
few years from now? Can he be taken seriously when he states that
a fourth marital partner is not an option, since they are sincere
about their marriage obligations and are committed “to be
honest and open with each other and not philander”? What makes
three a company but four – or five – a crowd?
The
lesson for us to learn here in America is simple: Marriage is the
union of one man and one woman, and we do well not to tamper with
that definition – unless, of course, we are ready to countenance
the possibility of a man adding a new married member to his household
every few years or a woman marrying her brother and son. Who among
us is ready to argue for that “civil right”?
The Coalition
of Conscience is a network of Christian leaders and believers, currently
based in the greater Charlotte, North Carolina area, who are working
together for moral and cultural change through the gospel.
Dr.
Michael L. Brown is the Director of the Coalition and serves
as its voice to the local and national community.
Dr.
Michael L. Brown
ICN Ministries
PO Box 1446
Harrisburg, NC 28075
704-782-3760
e-mail: ministry@icnministries.org
|