|
THE “CIVIL RIGHT”
TO POLYGAMY?
In a two day period during the last
week of September, the case for same-sex marriages in America was dealt two serious
blows. First, on September 29, California’s governor Arnold Schwarzenegger
vetoed a bill seeking to legalize same-sex marriages. Then, on September 30, the
Netherlands approved its first polygamous civil union. “I love both Bianca
and Mirjam, so I am marrying them both,” stated Victor de Bruijn, who was
already married to Bianca.
Governor Schwarzenegger has been
accused of siding with those who deny gays and lesbians equality, opposing their
basic civil rights. His veto, which simply upholds the will of the people of California
as reflected in their year 2000 vote, is an obvious setback to the cause of same-sex
marriages. The Netherlands ruling, however, while representing a less obvious setback
to same-sex marriages, is potentially more damaging. This is because proponents
of traditional, heterosexual marriage have consistently argued that once the fundamental
definition of marriage is changed from “one man and one woman” to “one
person and one person, regardless of sexual orientation,” there is no logical
or rational way to stop the slippery slide into polygamous marriages, incestuous
marriages, or even adult-child marriages. Indeed, one Canadian scientist has even
suggested that, in the future, there would be nothing to stop someone from marrying
a plant.
Same-sex marriage proponents have
strenuously resisted this line of reasoning, but with little logical support. On
what basis, it may be fairly asked, is it a civil right for a man to marry a man
(or a woman marry a woman) while it is not a civil right for a man to marry two
(or more) women or a brother to marry his sister or an adult woman to marry an adolescent
girl? Indeed, a case is now pending in the courts arguing for the right to incestuous
marriages, while Nadine Strossen, the president of the ACLU, has stated that her
organization has “defended the right of individuals to engage in polygamy.”
Now, with the Netherlands leading
the way, we have moved from theory to reality, and it is not hard to speculate as
to what will come next. Holland was the first nation to legalize same-sex civil
unions (in 1998), followed by legalized same-sex marriages and full adoption rights
for same-sex couples in 2001. At present, polygamous marriages are not legal but
polygamous civil unions are. What will tomorrow hold? And where will Mr. Bruijin
and his wives find themselves a few years from now? Can he be taken seriously when
he states that a fourth marital partner is not an option, since they are sincere
about their marriage obligations and are committed “to be honest and open
with each other and not philander”? What makes three a company but four –
or five – a crowd?
The lesson for us to learn here in
America is simple: Marriage is the union of one man and one woman, and we do well
not to tamper with that definition – unless, of course, we are ready to countenance
the possibility of a man adding a new married member to his household every few
years or a woman marrying her brother and son. Who among us is ready to argue for
that “civil right”?
The Coalition of Conscience is a
network of Christian leaders and believers, currently based in the greater Charlotte,
North Carolina area, who are working together for moral and cultural change through
the gospel.
Dr. Michael L. Brown is the Director of the Coalition and serves
as its voice to the local and national community.
Download this document in PDF format: click here
Dr. Michael L. Brown
ICN Ministries
PO Box 1446
Harrisburg, NC 28075
704-782-3760
e-mail: ministry@icnministries.org
|